Relocate
By Serge Kreutz As good lawyers know, you can have everything you need, or want, without breaking the law. Laws differ from place to place. What is perfectly OK in one country can deliver a man to the hangman’s noose in another.
Laws change, and people have short memories. That a behavior has been condoned traditionally is no protection against laws that subsequently criminalize it.
---
A man who has made a million dollars in the West has good reason to stop making money. Or put that endeavor on a low burner. No need to be as rich as Bill Gates. It would be foolish.
Instead, he should escape civilization. And build his own "kingdom" in a less developed part of the world.
It will be better to go without a Western wife. A man will not be able to live his sexual dreams if staying with a wife in the West. The wife may be an understanding companion. But on one issue she will not compromise. She wants her man all for herself.
In other parts of the world, and in other cultures, rich Western men have a very high sexual market value, even if older.
And in other parts of the world, it is easier for a man to design his life in a manner that avoids conflict among parallel love relationships.
---
In a poor and poorly policed Third World city, morals and traditional restrictions on a person’s behavior are gradually lost. What counts is the economic bottom line. Female partner choice is guided more by economic considerations than it would be in a rich First World society.
In a rich First World society, it would be seen as proof of a poor character if the partner choice of a young attractive woman were primarily determined by how rich a man is.
No such scruples in a poor Third World city.
The most important aspect is: does he have the means, not just to support a family or household; but also, the means to provide financial support during a temporary relationship.
---
In rich First World countries, men face problems maximizing sexual relationships . Of course, any man can engage in a single long-term sexual relationship with a single partner. This is an option open to virtually everyone in a First World country. That every man should have one woman also matches the idea of equal and just allocation of resources, which is an ideological pillar of Western social democracies.
By contrast, non-Christian Asian countries, as well as Third World countries in general, are better suited for an agenda of optimizing a man’s sexual experience.
In Third World countries, a general situation of chaos will often mean less social control over those who transgress anti-sexual local morals. Non-Christian Asian countries have a higher acceptance of sexual pleasure per se. In both, Third World countries and Non-Christian Asian countries, one furthermore finds a higher acceptance of the exchange of material values and sexual gratifications.
This does not mean prostitution. To classify a sexual act as prostitution, more defining elements are needed than just the fact that one party receives anything of value for granting sexual access. A prostitute grants sexual gratifications indiscriminately to everyone who is willing to pay. She is highly promiscuous.
Young women in Third World countries who prefer richer boyfriends over poorer ones cannot be classified as prostitutes, even if they expect material benefits.
---
Humans live in societies in which every individual occupies a position relative to other individuals. This also applies if we evaluate each person’s attractiveness as sexual partner.
Many factors determine a person’s sexual market value: physical attractiveness, age, wealth, economic stability. Achievers rank higher than non-achievers. Intelligent men fare better than ordinary ones.
For young woman, beauty is such a dominant factor that even stupidity doesn’t matter much. Because everything is so easy for young beautiful women, they are often spoiled. Later, they experience the strongest decline of their sexual market value.
The positions of men and women are not balanced in the same manner in each and every culture. The position of women is strongest in Western European and North American societies. There, the rules are set by women more than in traditional societies, the Arab world, East Asia, religious India.
Because there is no real poverty in Western European and North American societies, material considerations play less a role there than in any Third World country.
The degree to which a man’s sexual market value is determined by his economic means is much greater in countries where a large number of families struggle to make ends meet.
In many Third World societies, it is common for the most beautiful local women to have a Western boyfriend or husband, and even those Western men who can’t compete well in their own societies will have no ranking problem in Third World societies.
Is it sensible to participate in the courting game in Western Europe or North America if the rules in Third World societies are much more in favor of men, especially men from Western Europe and North America? Is it worthwhile to spend one’s resources in the rich countries of Western Europe and North America when the same economic means catapult a man into the top 1 percent of all contenders in a Third World country?
For a practical man, the answer must be no.
---
Why would a man with money want to live in the developed world?
He should take his money, pack his bag, and go and live somewhere where his money counts.
With enough money, at the right place, a man can still be a feudal master? The ruler of an own little empire?
In the developed world, money doesn’t count as much as in the Third World. And society is so organized that there is limited freedom, and predictable sexual boredom.
---
The sexual market value of both males and females varies from country, and depends on a multitude of factors. Asian women experience a great boost in their sexual market value if they migrate to Western Europe. Western European men will see their sexual market value rise greatly if they migrate to a suited Asian country.
We live one life only, and it is too valuable to not be at a place where one enjoys an optimal sexual market value. Where to be is anybody’s most important decision.
The Philippines were ideal in the early 80’s, and probably even better in the 70’s. There was a decisive turn to the worse in the late 80’s.
Western foreigners who were in Thailand at the beginning of the 80’s claim that at that time, Thailand was already on the decline as a destination for sexual relationships.
Western foreigners who were in Cambodia in the mid 90’s when the only way to get safely to Phnom Penh was to fly in, claim great charm.
Once a country qualifies as a destination because Western foreign men have an extraordinarily high sexual market value, its quality as a destination will decline the more Western foreign men go there.
So, is the World as such getting worse for Western men seeking sexual relationships? Probably, in the first decade of the 21st century, this is the case because of ever increasing social control.
But even if the world gets worse overall, there are always some countries that, unexpectedly, get better.
But as with all countries, after becoming a good destination for sexual relationships rather suddenly, there will likely be a rather long decline when matters gradually become worse and worse.
The challenge is to always find the country where, at a certain time, the sexual market value of foreign men has all of a sudden taken a big boost, or where, rather simply, the sexual market value of foreign men is best. It’s a waste of one’s life to be at the wrong place.
---
Standard theory is that Homo sapiens became the dominating species on earth because we descended from trees and adopted a permanent upright posture, leaving our hands free to use for other purposes, rather than hanging on tree branches.
Allegedly, a pattern developed that gave humans a reproductive edge by freeing mothers of young children from searching for food as this would be handled by males. This sharing of responsibilities allowed females to become pregnant every year, and at the same time to take care of a considerable number of offspring.
For males to be caring husbands and fathers, it was essential that an upright posture had been adopted to efficiently manage the transportation of food for their wives and children, left behind at a safe location.
An incentive for males to become food suppliers was the availability of females for sex at any time, and not just during fertile periods.
Evolution and natural selection favored hypersexual males, and females that could raise several subsequent birth-years of offspring. By contrast, the usual mammalian pattern is that a next set of offspring is born when a previous one has been weaned. Humans have adapted to their pattern through millions of years.
Humans have lately made great progress. The emphasis is on “lately”. The modern world started only some 200 years ago, with industrialization and science.
What separates us from the stone-age tribes of 100,000 years ago, is cultural, not biological. We are changing our societies at great speed. But our genetically encoded characters are the same as tens of thousands of years ago.
The genetically encoded pattern of behavior is that females raise children, and males find food and protect.
In human evolution, the most successful reproductive strategy for females has been to bind a male who would provide food and protection for her and her offspring. For HER and HER offspring; not the offspring of other females. Female jealousy is a biological trait.
Essential traits of the male character are also genetically encoded. The most successful reproductive strategy for a male is to spread his genes over as many women as possible, provided many descendents will survive. Males want to build harems, formal or not.
The equation “sex for food” is inherently understood. It applies to wives and prostitutes.
Sexual relationships are important for women and men. In societies of need, there are clear and simple patterns for orientation. Females have sexual needs, but they select males in accordance to their qualifications as providers and protectors. Males aim to improve their qualifications by seeking wealth and success.
In an affluent society, people lack such orientation, and everything gets confused.
1997